Le 07/06/2011 16:30, Martin Paljak a écrit :
> Hello,
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 18:53 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>
>> Le 06/06/2011 15:31, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>> On May 29, 2011, at 10:05 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>>>>>> I have a xulrunner application that uses the old modified version of 
>>>>>> opensc.dll and that needs to be used with the actual OpenSC PKCS#11 
>>>>>> module .
>>>>>> Static linking will allow the peaceful cohabitation.
>>>>> I would suggest statically compiling the custom version and using it 
>>>>> however you find necessary or combining
>>>> It's not actually possible.
>>> Why not? What is the custom xulrunner application anyway? Given it is 
>>> "custom", any set of "customizations" should be possible?
>> The reasons are mostly 'internals'.
>> The build application procedure is quite complicated, subject of the intense 
>> QA testing, and finally is not easy to change.
> ...
>
>>> Changing the installer is also possible, but it should follow some 
>>> reasonable and consistent style. Just bundling more files does not seem 
>>> like one.
>>>
>>> Possible options could be:
>>> A: current situation
>>> B: blend between static and dynamic linking inside OpenSC package
>>>   - static PKCS#11
>>>   - static Minidriver
>>>   - opensc.dll for tools only, in tools folder
>> This would be perfect for me. Can this scheme be adopted as a general and 
>> replace the current one ?
> Seems reasonable. Will see how it affects the size of the installer.


The difference in size will be around 1M (both pkcs#11 and minidriver are 
static) .


> I still believe that OpenSC installer should try to follow what is the most 
> optimal solution for the "normal user" of OpenSC and any internal 
> developments adjust to that.


> Taking the Spanish example, the opposite has caused more problems in the long 
> run than solve them...

What's happened with the Spanish card?


> Best,
> Martin

Kind regards,
Viktor.


_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to