Hello, On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Douglas E. Engert <deeng...@anl.gov> wrote: > The way forward is not necessarily more commiters, but a plan > for the next release and some action.
Well, once there was maintainer for each subject, so if maintainer of (in this case) ePass2003 decides to put a specific implementation it should be OK. If another one is working on SM and it effects only specific drivers, why not? For example, I don't think I need to beg to include the removal of the libltdl dependency should be trivial even if I got this only 99%. This project loses its flexibility, this is not an advantage. You can decide which feature goes to which milestone, and cooperate with people within different branches. Alon. _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
