Peter Stuge wrote: > The current config has strong arguments, even if it brings slightly > more inconvenience. I actually favor not changing the config, even if > we will have to rebase each and every change.
Thinking again about this, there's another possible problematic situation which I don't like as much.. If there's a long list of changes which haven't been reviewed yet, and review starts with some older change, and review results in that older change being updated, as I've done for changes 1 and 2 now, then *every* change after that one has to be updated, and they have to be updated in the order that they will be submitted. This is a bit awkward.. //Peter _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
