Le dimanche 01 avril 2012 à 23:21 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit : > No one volunteered to help. As I wrote in my initial email, I now do > plan for option 3.
Ludovic, please listen to us.
There is also the option 4, proposed by Viktor:
Anyway, now that you plan to reject ALL patches from Jerrit, nothing
should stop you from moving SM branch to Gerrit. No?
> > 4. Big part of the patches in backlog comes from SM branch. This
> branch was
> > recently merged with the public 'staging'.
> > So, my proposition is to:
> > 4a. cherry-pick proposals from 'your staging' that are not related
> to SM and
> > not yet present in 'public staging' ;
> > 4b. switch the 'public staging' to 'SM' and use it as a principal
> > development base and base for releases;
> > 4c. reset official gerrit to the 'staging' at this moment;
> > 4d. re-submit previously cherry-picked proposals.
> Viktor, your proposal is work to do for someone. I do not volunteer.
Ludovic, then leave the community more freedom to organize. We are not
asking you to volunteer and do not want to rely on your work to go
forward. OpenSC should be organized on the same vein as tokend or
libccid.
Viktor and community, is there a way to agree to switch the 'public
staging' to 'SM' and use it as a principal base for releases?
Kind regards,
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
