Hi Allen,
Allen Bierbaum wrote:
> Is it possible for an attachment container class to be an attachment? I
> think the answer is no, but maybe I am missing something.
>
> If not, why not? I am fixing up the ContainerPool class I added, and I
> want to allow it to be an attachment but I also would like to be able to
> name it using the Name attachment. Is that just not possible?
if your only concern is to name a ContainerPool instance you could add a
SFString to hold that - ok, bit of a hack maybe ;)
Cheers,
Carsten
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
