Carsten Neumann wrote: > Hi Allen, > >Allen Bierbaum wrote: > > >>Is it possible for an attachment container class to be an attachment? I >>think the answer is no, but maybe I am missing something. >> >>If not, why not? I am fixing up the ContainerPool class I added, and I >>want to allow it to be an attachment but I also would like to be able to >>name it using the Name attachment. Is that just not possible? >> >> > >if your only concern is to name a ContainerPool instance you could add a >SFString to hold that - ok, bit of a hack maybe ;) > > > I was just doing this while you were writing this e-mail. :)
It will work, I was just trying to understand why I couldn't do it the other way. Thanks, Allen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
