Hi Dirk,
Dirk Reiners wrote:
> Hi Allen,
>
> Allen Bierbaum wrote:
>> Is it possible for an attachment container class to be an attachment? I
>> think the answer is no, but maybe I am missing something.
>>
>> If not, why not? I am fixing up the ContainerPool class I added, and I
>> want to allow it to be an attachment but I also would like to be able to
>> name it using the Name attachment. Is that just not possible?
>
> I don't see a reason why that wouldn't be possible.
it's two different inheritance hierarchies. Combining the right mixins
probably allows creating an attachable attachment container, but since
attachments are (need to be?) special cased at a couple of places I'm
not sure if it's a good idea to allow attachments on attachments, but an
interesting one nevertheless ;)
Carsten
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
