Honsing Cheng wrote:
> Currently the load balancing feature is limited to shared-IP zones. But
> we do believe that at some future point we would like to expand it to
> include exclusive-IP zones. So if it is relatively straight-forward to
> include the instance ID, we should pursue it.
All you'd need is to include a extra argument to all the cl callbacks
(in the form of a netstackid_t or something similar.)
I don't know if that would cause more incompatibilities than you are
already causing with this project. If it doesn't it might make sense to
include that argument now even though clustering would never inspect its
value until you decide to support exclusive-IP zones.
Erik
