Danek Duvall wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 03:11:13PM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote: > > >> I think you missed the point I was trying to make it wasn't a /usr/share vs >> /usr/lib distinction but the fact that there is already a system wide place >> for zsh "extensions/plugins/whatever" yet this case appears to be >> suggesting that /usr/lib/shell/zsh would be that place. >> > > I'm skeptical that anything zsh-specific should ever go there. I'm happy > to see if I can add to zsh's default fpath on Solaris to point to > /usr/lib/shell/whatever, but the zsh scripts will remain in /usr/share/zsh > and the zsh loadable modules will remain in /usr/lib/zsh. > > Danek > Furthermore, I will point out that we can deal with shells needing different locations for bits with judicious of symbolic links. I'm of a mind that /usr/lib/ksh or /usr/lib/ksh93 should be used. (I actually prefer the latter, unless the only things that will ever be in /usr/lib/ksh will also be capable of being used by the default /usr/bin/ksh.)
-- Garrett