Jim Walker ??: > Danek Duvall wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:46:33PM -0600, Jim Walker wrote: >> >>> Danek Duvall wrote: >>>> Missing are the classes and methods that are, presumably, part of the >>>> Public interface of any Java module intended for use by developers. >>>> Or are >>>> there no Private classes and methods in the jar file? If there's some >>>> distinction, then a simple list in a file in the materials >>>> directory is >>>> probably sufficient documentation. >>> Do you mean something like this: >>> http://junit.org/junit/javadoc/4.5/ >> >> Yes, that's the list of stuff, but a) it's spread over a ton of pages >> rather than a simple list in a text file and b) there are no stability >> attributes associated with any of those names. >> >> If you assert that all the interfaces described at that URL are >> Public, and >> that they are Uncommitted, that's fine (I'll assume that someone >> actually >> checked to make sure). But if there's any heterogeneity, it should be >> called out. > > There's public and protected interfaces, so we will need to put together > a list of the public interfaces. > > Cheers, > Jim > I think ?Protected' is a java attribute, The user may use public or protected method in a different way. But still both of them are public interfaces for a user or developer.
Mengwei
