Joseph Kowalski wrote: > >> It doesn't qualify for a fast track, I think, because of the new APIs >> that it introduces. > So, a fast-track isn't based on size,... We've approved huge things > like integration of POSIX standards. > > I don't know of a rule about "contains new APIs". > > The definition of fast-tack is "obvious and non-controversial".
Its *probably* not controversial. I'm not sure it is obvious.
-- Garrett
