Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I thought John officially derailed it. > > At this point, if John doesn't derail it, then I will -- if only so that > we can offer some much needed advice.
My afternoon has been pretty hectic, and I am just now following up on the dozen or so things I should have gotten done earlier... After some more thought, derailing the case is premature; stopping the clock and keeping it from auto-approving before the compiler team's perspective is injected into the conversation is what is important. So, the case is in "waiting need spec" state, waiting for Steve and Stefan (and whomever else feels the spirit moving in them) to mind-meld... I would like to hear back from Stefan and Steve on their discussion; in particular, if they still have a large disconnect. To Bart's comment, after the mind meld, I would like Steve to come up with a more ARC-actionable list of concerns if he still feels that this case should derail into a full review. -John
