John Plocher wrote: > Stefan Teleman wrote: >> Steve Clamage and myself had reached an agreement on this, a couple of days >> ago: >> >> 1. We [ SFW/KDE ] were going to introduce this library in Nevada/OpenSolaris >> -- >> it's the easiest integration, and it's the one we care most about, because >> it >> can be done *now*. >> 2. They [ DevPro/Tools ] were going to introduce this library with the >> compiler(s), for Solaris 9/10, at some point in the future. I cannot say >> when >> that will be. >> >> Is this agreement still valid ? > > I hope so. Even if this case is derailed, derailing does not > invalidate anything. > > I would like to see in one place (i.e., NEED SPEC) the expected > transition/migration path (including who does what, where it will > live, and what names it will be known by) for the whole journey > from today (Sun shipping old/other stuff) to tomorrow (what this > case delivers) ending up at the day after (when the compiler team > delivers it). > > This is so we can validate the deployed app experience - will > things actually work while we do the transition? > > Most of this has been mentioned in this email thread, so I > do not think I'm asking for anything difficult.
This is absolutely fine, and to be expected. I propose to work with Steve Clamage and write up a document outlining in detail all the steps you indicated above. Steve, is this plan ok with you ? --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman Sun Microsystems, Inc. Stefan.Teleman at Sun.COM
