>First off, I really like what this case is trying to do. But I do have >a possible concern: /usr/ucb/ps could have been used with a leading >"-". E.g. /usr/ucb/ps -aux and /usr/ucb/ps aux both return the same thing. > >I'd humbly suggest that if getexecname returns /usr/ucb/ps then the >legacy UCB behavior should be used unconditionally.
What I propose isn't all that different. /usr/ucb/ps will ONLY behave like /usr/bin/ps IF AND ONLY IF one of the arguments is NOT recognized by /usr/ucb/ps. Rather than printing an error message, it tries to do something plausible. I thought the examples clarified that. Casper
