>This kind of precludes adding any new options to /usr/ucb/ps, ever. I >don't believe that this is a particularly bad thing, just want to be >crystal clear that this is what we want to do.
As Garrett says that would "violate the principle of least surprise"; the only problem would be that adding a,, e.g., "-f" option to /usr/ucb/ps would make "/usr/ucb/ps -ef" do something different. But you can still add the new option to /usr/ucb/ps. Casper
