Nicolas Williams writes: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:27:51PM -0800, George Vasick wrote: > > >If those commands shouldn't be in $PATH then just put them in a > > >sub-directory of /usr/lib. > > > > It is not a PATH conflict, it is a name conflict with the individual > > commands. They cannot be located in the same directory as the Solaris > > commands. The set of commands in question is > > You misunderstand my point. > > My point: these commands appear to be private to the compiler suite, > therefore DON'T pollute /usr, DO pollute /usr/lib.
Actually, the commands aren't private. What is private is the /usr/i386-pc-solaris2.11 path itself, and I agree that should be buried if possible. It's just noise. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
