On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:41:52AM -0800, George Vasick wrote: > The build actually produces hard links so it doesn't help much on > deciding which way softlinks should point. SuSE sets up the links the > same way we propose.
Just because the build does it one way doesn't mean we need to package it the same way (but yes, if you're in an OS/Net-like gate it's hard to change those hardlinks to symlinks). I second John's point. > Is there any trade off between links versus binaries in the most > commonly accessed location, i.e. I expect /usr/gnu/bin/as to be be the > preferred path. That is the path the compiler will use for example. John's point relates to how updates will work. Nico --
