Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: >> Mark Logan writes: >>> I only buried ntfsprogs because I thought it would be easier to make it >>> through PSARC that way. I guess I miscalculated. I did not hack >>> ntfsprogs at all, it was the easiest thing to port. I have no problem >>> delivering ntfsprogs in its entirety and in /usr/bin, if that is the >>> consensus. >> +1 on the project. >> >> If Volatile, then it'll be up to the Install people to figure out how >> they're going to depend on it, so that's just delaying the matter. > > > The open question I have is: "do we really a new profile". There's > already a "File System Management". (includes commands like format, > fsck, newfs, mkfs). Hm, not fdisk, though.... >
I agree that the "File System Management" profile should be used. A new profile will not be needed since auths will not be used. Phi
