Phi Tran wrote:
> Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>> The open question I have is: "do we really a new profile". There's
>> already a "File System Management". (includes commands like format,
>> fsck, newfs, mkfs). Hm, not fdisk, though....
>>
>
> I agree that the "File System Management" profile should be used. A
> new profile will not be needed since auths will not be used.
>
> Phi
Just as an aside, if you were adding new authorizations, there's no
reason you couldn't add them to the File System Management profile.
I'm glad that you've decided to use an existing profile and not add new
authorizations. I just wanted to clarify that these are two separate
decisions.
Scott
--
Scott Rotondo
Principal Engineer, Solaris Security Technologies
President, Trusted Computing Group
Phone/FAX: +1 408 850 3655 (Internal x68278)
