> I'm glad that you've decided to use an existing profile and not add new > authorizations. I just wanted to clarify that these are two separate > decisions. >
There was an issue brought up about fdisk which doesn't have an entry in exec_attr. I assume the intention was to not allow regular users to use fdisk or maybe this is a bug. One could call fdisk from format, but I don't think that was a requirement to use fdisk. I think parted and fdisk should be allowed for regular users since these commands could be useful for removable media. These commands can be included with the File System Management profile and given appropriate privileges as suggested previously. I'd like to get any comments to see if there should be a reason that parted should follow fdisk permission handling or if the case should continue with adding parted to the File System Management profile with appropriate privileges. Thanks, Phi