Danek Duvall wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:41:25AM -0700, George Vasick wrote: > >>> Is there any reason that 1.10 can't simply be replaced by 1.10.2? IIRC, >>> there were incompatibilities between 1.9 and 1.10, which is why both are >>> there. As far as I can tell, Ubuntu doesn't have separate packages for >>> each version in the 1.10.X series, just for those in 1.X. >> Yes, I think this is a better approach. I'll do some test builds with SFW >> and ON to make sure they are compatible. > > Cool, thanks. > >>> Also, note that most of the updates you present here have no interface >>> changes, so they don't really need ARC approval -- simply upgrading one >>> component to another doesn't necessarily have any architectural impact. >> What about adding a man page where the previous version of a package did >> not include one or adding new info pages that were not in the previous >> version? >> >> Technically, this could be viewed as a change to the user interface, but >> it wouldn't necessarily have architectural impact. > > Documentation may be a part of the user's total experience, but it isn't an > interface, so it doesn't have architectural impact.
Thanks for the clarification, George > > Danek
