Xiuyan.Wang at Sun.COM writes: > Actually, I'm not satisfied with the name either. But I do not think we > should refuse to integrate the driver due to its name. We had suggested > to Myricom to rename the driver to something following our naming > conventional better, such as mxge or myxge. But Myricom did not want to > do so as they had exposed it to their customers and it might cause > confusion to them.
If you suggested a better name, then that's good enough for me. > Still, it would be better if we can find a solution to address such > issue. Unless it violates one of the already-expressed naming constraints or the bounds of good taste, I don't think we ought to do more than recommend that folks choose decent driver names. If they still refuse, and adamantly want to use an awkward name even after getting contrary advice, then I think our work is done. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
