Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Hmm... reading the man page, /etc/default/star seems to follow
> convention for /etc/default/tar. So there is history for *that* file,
> at least. (Though I admit I'd prefer it if star read /etc/default/tar
> rather than creating a new /etc/ file which must be kept in synch with
> /etc/default/tar.
Didn't one of the SMF cases Obsolete the use of /etc/default/?
I agree - things would be different if it simply reused /etc/default/tar,
but new projects such as this should not be using it...
> Looking at the man page for rmt, it looks like /etc/default/rmt is a bit
> of a tougher decision.
Adding a new /etc/default/rmt seems wrong for those same reasons.
The ARC can certainly choose otherwise, but doing so seems to run counter
to the expressed desire to Obsolete /etc/default...
-John
