When integrating a project through SFW consolidation, is it requirement that it be modified to fit into SMF?
Thanks, Margot Gary Winiger wrote: >> Gary Winiger <gww at eng.sun.com> wrote: >> >> >>>> Current changes: >>>> >>>> - /usr/sbin/rmt executable from ON replaced by the rmt from star >>>> - /etc/default/rmt configuration file added (defaults to full >>>> access) >>>> >>> In the face of the SMF policy, >>> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/SMF-policy/ >>> what the justification for add a default file? >>> What's the auditable administrative interface? >>> See the audit policy: >>> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/audit-policy/ >>> for the administrative interface? >>> >>> BSD rmt(8) from MacOS 10.5.2 doesn't seem to require a defaults >>> file. Nor does rmt(1M). >>> >> These are older implementaions. If you use rmt from star without >> /etc/default/rmt, you get more security than the current rmt implements. >> This may cause people to fail with their access patterns. If you like to >> make rmt as permissive as historical implementaions, you need to tdo this via >> /etc/default/rmt >> > > See the SMF policy relative to new /etc configuration files. > See the Audit policy for administrator audit requirements. >
