Hi Bill, On 03/ 5/10 02:00 AM, Bill Yan wrote: > Interface | Stability | Description > ------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------- > > /usr/bin/ddu-text | Uncommitted | Command to invoke text mode UI > ------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------- > > /usr/bin/ddu --silent | Uncommitted | Command to invoke GUI ddu in > silent mode > ------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------- > > ddu_devscan() | Consolidation private | DDU library API [2] > ------------------------+-------------+---------------------------------- > ddu_package_lookup() | Consolidation private | DDU library API [2] > ddu_build_repo_list() | | > ddu_install_package() | | > ------------------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------- > > ddu_repo_object | Consolidation private | DDU library object [2] > ddu_package_object | | > ddu_dev_data | | > ------------------------+-------------------------+----------------------------------
This looks good. In addition, I'd like to see the python module name itself in the interface table, as this is the name programs will import (see separate disussion with Jack Schwartz). > And we are going to add man pages for /usr/bin/ddu-text and /usr/bin/ddu > Excellent. > Regarding the SVR4 and IPS package issue, Jack will help to address the > issue and cite appropriate bugs to IPS team. Thanks a lot for Jack's help. That is a step in the right direction, but I was hoping for something more specific before this case gets approved. For example, a statement to the effect, "we've spoken with the IPS team, and they've committed to X to address the issue" or "we've spoken with the IPS team, and we will be modifying the architecture of this case by doing Y in order to play nice with IPS". Thanks, -Seb
