On 03/09/10 16:09, Jack Schwartz wrote: > Hi Sebastien. > >>> Regarding the SVR4 and IPS package issue, Jack will help to address the >>> issue and cite appropriate bugs to IPS team. Thanks a lot for Jack's >>> help. >> >> That is a step in the right direction, but I was hoping for something >> more specific before this case gets approved. For example, a statement >> to the effect, "we've spoken with the IPS team, and they've committed >> to X to address the issue" or "we've spoken with the IPS team, and we >> will be modifying the architecture of this case by doing Y in order to >> play nice with IPS". > I have spoken with the IPS team about this issue, which is encapsulated > as their bug 2434. They have agreed to fix it. > > I have also updated 2434 to make it clear that this PSARC case requires > that it get fixed. > > Thanks, > Jack >> >> Thanks, >> -Seb >
With whom did you speak, Jack? - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance bart.smaalders at oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird."
