Jack Schwartz wrote: > Hi Sebastien. > > >>Regarding the SVR4 and IPS package issue, Jack will help to address the > >>issue and cite appropriate bugs to IPS team. Thanks a lot for > >>Jack's help. > > > >That is a step in the right direction, but I was hoping for > >something more specific before this case gets approved. For > >example, a statement to the effect, "we've spoken with the IPS > >team, and they've committed to X to address the issue" or "we've > >spoken with the IPS team, and we will be modifying the architecture > >of this case by doing Y in order to play nice with IPS". > I have spoken with the IPS team about this issue, which is > encapsulated as their bug 2434. They have agreed to fix it.
FWIW, we (I) did not agree to fix bug 2434; we simply agreed to work with the DDU team to make sure that their requirements were met. Danek
