Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> On 03/24/10 11:07 AM, Hai-May Chao wrote:
>> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>>> I see no major issues with this case.
>>>
>>> However the packaging will need to be different.
>>>
>>> Probably one of these:
>>>
>>> pkg:/library/security/openssl/perl/{aes,bignum,...}
>>> pkg:/library/perl-5/openssl/{aes,bignum,...}
>>>
>>> I think the second one is more likely as these are perl bindings for
>>> openssl.
>>>
>>
>> I'm still using SVR4 packaging scheme. I touched base with Norm,
>> and he suggested for me to use SVR4 definitions for now, until SFW
>> moves to IPS. Depending on the timing, I'll either change it before my
>> putback or it will be changed to IPS with the rest of the gate.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hai-May
>>
>
> That's fine with me, but you need to fix the "Committed" value for
> your package names -- clearly they are not Committed, since you know
> you'll be changing them soon.
>
> - Garrett
>
I'll fix it.
Thanks,
Hai-May
