On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:54:05AM -0800, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > Does the CTF format define a representation for VLAs? How about the > other stuff introduced in C99 (like complex and explicit booleans)? Can > it convert these properly from DWARF even if not from stabs?
We don't have a representation for VLAs, but we also don't need one, as there's no place where we have to store such a beast in CTF. The other types aren't a problem either AFAIK regards john _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
