John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:54:05AM -0800, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > > Does the CTF format define a representation for VLAs? How about the > > other stuff introduced in C99 (like complex and explicit booleans)? Can > > it convert these properly from DWARF even if not from stabs? > > We don't have a representation for VLAs, but we also don't need one, as > there's no place where we have to store such a beast in CTF. The other > types aren't a problem either AFAIK
What about the case when a compiler optimizes C99 booleans and stores multiple |bool| variables into a bitfield (BTW: Does CTF support bitfields ?) ? ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
