> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Eric, this is a really tough policy.  It is tough to enforce and tough to
>> tell people, good people, that no, we can not have you building software
>> that will be running in the servers at Lockheed Martin, NASA and MIT.  The
>> issue of liability has been a very tough one but it was needed.
>
> Why do you assume just because someone has a job their employer is in any
> way willing to accept liability for their open source actions?

Its a good way to verify that they are real people with a real identity.

>   I don't
> know of any other "open community" that has similar restrictions, and in
> the open source development communities, students are often found among
> the best contributors to the community.

And we have a pile.  Have you seen the latest?  The OpenSolaris distro from
Martin Bochnig?

    http://www.blastwave.org/articles/BLS-0048/index.html

He is a student by the way.

>
>> Have there been exceptions?  Absolutely.
>
> Given your blog stories about looking for a job, aren't you the leading
> example that requiring someone to be gainfully employed to contribute
> to blastwave doesn't make much sense?

Hmmm .. well now you are getting personal.  That's okay.

At the time that Blastwave was formed I had more than sufficient finances
and ownership in a company.  It was a joy to start and to foster.  Despite
my tough times over the last year I still do everything that I can to keep
everything running and growing.  With a little contract work lately I was
able to beef up the NFS server to 200GB and to get us onto fibre bandwidth
all hosted.  Its been super tough but well worth it I think.  Sometimes
people need to make sacrifices to do a "good thing".  Thus I spend a lot of
time in a basement these days but its a lot of fun.

    http://www.blastwave.org/dclarke/blog/index.html

So no one questioned my identity or intentions.
I don't think you would either.


Dennis
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to