I think the problem is not the criticism, but rather, the way in which it is presented. The blog entry doesn't really qualify as "constructive criticism" because it fails to offer "valid and well-reasoned opinions about the work of others, usually involving both positive and negative comments, in a friendly manner rather than an oppositional one" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_criticism).
Personally, I think many people are more than willing to address any criticism directed at Solaris as long as it's constructive. This particular blog entry makes some claims in an oppositional tone without valid and well-reasoned arguments to back them up. Not everything on the page lacks a constructive tone, yet, it could have been done better. Not that I expect the person to be perfect in how they give feedback, they're only human after all ;) -Shawn This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
