On 10/18/06, Josh Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/18/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Hurst writes:
> > On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
> > >
> > > 4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
> > I suggest that you wait until the ksh93 integration project is done
> > with it's work. The project suffers from excessive bureaucracy
> > overhead and in my opinion a discussion should be started to
> > streamline the project integration process. The current process has
> > become unbearable and this needs to be corrected before new projects
> > are launched
>
> Your fear-mongering is completely misplaced just plain unacceptable.
Please understand that I am trying to start a generalised discussion
whether all this bureaucracy is REQUIRED. No other Open Source project
requires this kind of excessive bureaucracy overhead.
I do not feel very well that I have to kickstart this discussion but I
think the excessive delays in the ksh93 integration project are no
longer bearable and require at least a look at the general process.
I'd like to start a constructive discussion about the problems because
a reform is overdue
I've added the CAB discussion list to the CC: for comments. IMO the
problem should be discussed before any new projects are started. We
need a new, streamlined process which makes sure that projects are no
longer trashed with excessive bureaucracy
--
Josh
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
