On 2/23/07, Ghee Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
> On 2/16/07, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Girts Zeltins wrote:
>> > Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
>> > I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug
>> database, will they be fixed? Is there any chance to see them fixed?
>>
>> If they are serious bugs, then they may be fixed. Low priority (P4
>> & P5)
>> bugs aren't being worked on much, and work is beginning on determining
>> which parts of CDE will be removed as part of the ongoing EOF process,
>> so things being removed (mostly the applications) aren't likely to be
>> fixed unless escalated by a customer with a support contract for
>> Solaris 8, 9, or 10. Public libraries, dtksh, and similar interfaces
>> that other applications may depend on are planned to stick around.
>
> WIll Sun FIX dtksh? Both experts in this field - David Korn and Roland
> Mainz have complained about dtksh being utterly broken because Sun
> used an unofficial alpha code as ksh basis.
Was it a Sun decision or the consortium decision? I guess it has to
be latter.
HPUX uses ksh93n for their dtksh. Maybe the consortium did an update
which Sun did not integrate? Wouldn't be a surprise for me since Sun
didn't update for CDE2 either
Josh
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
