Hey, Stephen Lau wrote: > Mark J. Nelson wrote: >> 7. I haven't figured out what will be needed in the way of an on-discuss >> mailing list. We traditionally have not had such a beast inside Sun, >> though on-all has occasionally been [ab]used in this fashion. >> >> Anybody got an opinion on this? > > I don't think we need an on-discuss, I'd just as soon follow-up > discussion be sent to opensolaris-code or something. > > on-all may have been [ab]used in this fashion, but not enough to warrant > its own list.
I'm not sure I agree. Being able to be consistent across all our mailing lists would be far more preferable, and getting ride of the hazy opensolaris-code would be a good step in that direction. Perhaps [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a better replacement? Glynn _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
