Daniel Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If df had a similar output, I'd prefer this:
>
> 8388608 3041200 5347408 37%
> 33554432 1605719 31794110 5%
> 62914560 37766679 14129948 73%
> 62914560 11017932 14129948 44%
> 1535901696 1187247048 263079735 82%
> 134217728 32200480 74728050 31%
> 4194304 1392793 2801511 34%
>
> over this any time:
>
> 8.0G 2.9G 5.1G 37%
> 32G 1.5G 30G 5%
> 60G 36G 13G 73%
> 60G 11G 13G 44%
> 1.4T 1.1T 251G 82%
> 128G 31G 71G 31%
> 4.0G 1.3G 2.7G 34%
>
> I don't count digits. I just memorize patterns. More digits => larger size.
I only use the ls -h output in case I need to know the amount.
In most cased, I prefer the normal ls output.
Note that I frequently use:
ls -l | sort -n +4
to find the largest file and this will not work with ls -lh.
For df, I use df -h more frequently but I still don'e like df -h to
be the default.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
