>Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > Compared to other marketing activities from Sun, >> > this would be cheap and the >> > current idea of "project Indiana" looks to me like >> > a Sun OpenSolaris >> > distribution that (if done the way it currently >> > seems) will most likely embrace >> > and crush the sensitive plants that are the real >> > free grown distributions. >> >> I do not see why a Sun OpenSolaris distribution will >> kill off your 'real free' distribution or any of the >> other 'real free' distributions. > >I don't see that it would help to have a second Sun Solaris distribution. >If Sun likes to put money into OpenSolaris, this should be done in a way >that enables collaboration and in a way that allows to contribute code by >non-Sun people.
It doesn't matter if it helps or not, or does it? If Sun feels justified in spending its money that way, then why can it not spend it that way. Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
