Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, why use GDM instead of KDM then? Other than "because it's there" ?
>
> If someone wants to make KDM support Solaris, I think that would
> be great. As I explained, I think a11y support was the main reason
> we picked GDM over KDM initially.
>From my understanding, this would either need a binary standard for C++
or a way to define a different LD_RUN_PATH for gcc compiled binaries.
But the latter would not share all code in memory.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
