On 29.01.2010 15:05, casper....@sun.com wrote:
> 
> 
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> have you also evaluated going the AMD route? I am also looking into
>> setting up a home server, and I have seen that with AMD one can get ECC
>> RAM for much less money.
> 
> Which systems are you thinking of?
> 
>> Additionally, there seem to be not much difference power consumption
>> wise when compared to ATOM based setups, when one chooses the right
>> components. I am a little bit hesitant to go this route, as driver
>> support for Intel based components seems to be better...
> 
> 
> The older Atom boards use around 40W, the newer around 20W.
> Neither have ECC.
> 
> I certainly would like to hear of a 20W or thereabouts AMD board.
> 
> Casper
> 

Concerning power consumption I am only referring to the old Atom boards.
And even then it's probably not possible to be equal. But something like
60W would also be OK, I guess. That won't hurt the power bill too much,
and such a system might have a lot more processing power on top of ECC.
And ECC would really be nice together with ZFS...

In fact I haven't decided on anything yet - I'm just wondering...

- Thomas
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
  • ... Matthias Pfützner - Principal Field Technologis t - Systems Infrastructure Ambassador - Solution Architect
    • ... Tim Foster
      • ... Matthias Pfützner
    • ... Casper . Dik
      • ... Matthias Pfützner
    • ... Robs
      • ... Matthias Pfützner
        • ... Thomas Maier-Komor
          • ... Casper . Dik
            • ... Thomas Maier-Komor
          • ... Matthias Pfützner
            • ... Thomas Maier-Komor
        • ... Michal Pryc
          • ... Milan Cermak
    • ... John Martin
    • ... Roger Savard
    • ... Matthias Pfützner
      • ... Cyril Plisko

Reply via email to