> On 04-15-10, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote: > Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> It would be nice to finally get that i18n code replaced, if for no other >> reason than to stop seeing articles about how the IBM System/Z port can't >> make progress because they can't build libc. > Isn't this funny while knowing that it is IBM that brevents this as IBM owns > the code that cannot be made OSS. > Jörg ---------------------------------------------------- Regarding the i18n code, do we have any sort of detailed specs on it such that a motivated programmer could sit down with a stack of POSIX books and just begin to hammer it out from first principals? I mean, without doing something obscene like reverse engineering or simple disassembly. Dennis ps: sorry about the lack of message indenting but Sun Convergence isn't doing that for me this morning. Thankfully it does not break maillist threads. _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
