On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Dennis Clarke <dcla...@blastwave.org> wrote: > >>On 05-10-10, John Plocher <john.ploc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson >><dave.johnson.inqu...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene? > >> While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciating >> detail > > John, I looked at it as "some guy" making a fair amount of noise and quoting > himself in his arguments. So like I said in an earlier message, I made a cup > of coffee and then felt that it wasn't worth looking at.
Did you read http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-May/056462.html? > > Personally I see the ksh93 shell work as some of the best open source > collaboration in modern UNIX(R) history. I fully expect that it will always > be around forever as some sort of package set to be installed. I agree. Both the ksh93 and the modernisation project it spawned are excellent work and would be of great benefit of Opensolaris. But all that work appears to be fruitless if the intentions of Oracle described in http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-May/056462.html will be implemented. Chris -- ^---^ (@)v(@) Chris Pickett | / IT consultant ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
