On 31 May 2010, at 12:55, homerun wrote: > If it is now "nailed" that next release is based on 134b what is a reason not > to publish 134a build to dev repo ?
If there's a 134b, one might presume it's because 134a wasn't stable enough to release. In which case, it's unlikely to be of much use to anyone who already has access to b134. It's also happened before that respins have been required to resolve legal or licensing issues that were only spotted after the build. If such issues existed in 134a, its release wouldn't be permitted by Oracle anyway. Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation, Ireland mailto:calum.ben...@oracle.com Solaris Desktop Team http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Oracle Corp. _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
