On 09/29/2010 07:06 PM, Kelly Linden wrote: > * In my mind the biggest issue is that mono scripts will appear 4x worse > than LSL scripts. This is really the reason I am hesitant to push a > function like this through before we have the ability for mono scripts > to better reflect how much memory they may use. We need more development > time for any solution on that front. Right now because a mono script > could use 64k, that is the only number we have available to count. Maybe > it would be nice to have an API to access number of scripts, number of > LSL vs. Mono scripts, amount of memory used and script time used. > However we rapidly get away from my desired philosophy of minimal > interfaces.
Don't overcomplicate things. Just count mono scripts as 16k as well. The average size of them is less than 16k, so it's still a conservative number. We don't need perfection. The person with 255 scripts in each shoe will still show up as using a lot. Splitting hairs over kilobyte perfect accuracy is pointless. -Jason _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
