On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 21:31:51 +0200 Ambrosia <chaoss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oz, as an aside.. > > Is there a plan to ever support building non-standalone on Linux > 64bit without installing 32bit libraries or workarounds? It can be a > nightmare with some distributions, and being forced to compile it as > 32bit in 2012 just feels..wrong. Soft Linden told me that he suggested 64-bit back in 2008, given the state of 32-bit compatibility in 64-bit distros. Also said Linux was a tiny segment and most Linux users were running 32-bit. (ubuntu SL users having twice the number of other distro users...combined) I suggested that one of the reasons for some SL Linux users running 32 was the fact that it's a pain in the ass to get SL releases running on 64-bit. And it's annoying to no end that I have to install 32 bit flash just so I can have flash on web-on-a-prim work. CronoCloud
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
