This is from viewer64 repo w/o changes.
0>c:\users\bill\p64\viewer64pure\indra\llcommon\llunittype.h(51): error
C2226: syntax error : unexpected type 'S'
(C:\Users\Bill\P64\viewer64pure\build-vc120-64\packages\llphysicsextensions\stub\LLPhysicsExtensionsStubImpl.cpp)
10>          c:\users\bill\p64\viewer64pure\indra\llcommon\llunittype.h(52)
: see reference to class template instantiation 'LLResultTypeAdd<S,T>'
being compiled
10>c:\users\bill\p64\viewer64pure\indra\llcommon\llunittype.h(51): error
C2226: syntax error : unexpected type 'S'
(C:\Users\Bill\P64\viewer64pure\build-vc120-64\packages\llphysicsextensions\stub\LLPathingLibStubImpl.cpp)
10>          c:\users\bill\p64\viewer64pure\indra\llcommon\llunittype.h(52)
: see reference to class template instantiation 'LLResultTypeAdd<S,T>'
being compiled
10>c:\users\bill\p64\viewer64pure\indra\llcommon\llunittype.h(51): error
C3646: 'type_t' : unknown override specifier
(C:\Users\Bill\P64\viewer64pure\build-vc120-64\packages\llphysicsextensions\stub\LLPhysicsExtensionsStubImpl.cpp)
10>c:\users\bill\p64\viewer64pure\indra\llcommon\llunittype.h(51): error
C3646: 'type_t' : unknown override specifier
(C:\Users\Bill\P64\viewer64pure\build-vc120-64\packages\llphysicsextensions\stub\LLPathingLibStubImpl.cpp)
10>c:\users\bill\p64\viewer64pure\indra\llcommon\llunittype.h(51): error
C4430: missing type specifier - int assumed. Note: C++ does not support
default-int
(C:\Users\Bill\P64\viewer64pure\build-vc120-64\packages\llphysicsextensions\stub\LLPhysicsExtensionsStubImpl.cpp)
10>c:\users\bill\p64\viewer64pure\indra\llcommon\llunittype.h(51): error
C4430: missing type specifier - int assumed. Note: C++ does not support
default-int
(C:\Users\Bill\P64\viewer64pure\build-vc120-64\packages\llphysicsextensions\stub\LLPathingLibStubImpl.cpp)
1

I suspected that I had stepped on my source so started with a fresh clone.
This kicks off pages of the same error.

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) <
o...@lindenlab.com> wrote:

> On 2016-12-22 09:58 , Nat Goodspeed wrote:
>
>
> In general, we have tried to isolate build artifacts under the
> build-whatever directory, in this case build-vc120-32 or build-vc120-64.
> That includes the libraries installed by autobuild: there should be
> separate build-vc120-32/packages and build-vc120-64/packages
> subdirectories. That separation should (!) also include CMake byproducts --
> though if indeed there's some unintentional crossover, I would suspect
> CMake stuff.
>
> Be alert for anything that's starting searches relative to the
> CMAKE_SOURC_DIR/..
>
>
> --
> OZ LINDEN | Engineering Director, Second Life
> email or hangouts: o...@lindenlab.com | Real Life: Scott Lawrence
> LINDEN LAB | Create Virtual Experiences <https://www.lindenlab.com>
>
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to