I'm being driven slowly mad by the number of files that have to be in
the CVS tree but also get modified by code. Most of them I can deal
with, but one I need some feedback on. In general, Makefile.ssl is
linked to Makefile (why???), and dependencies tacked on to the end of
Makefile.ssl. This needs to change. There are two obvious solutions:

1. Copy Makefile.ssl to Makefile instead of linking, and add
dependencies to the end of Makefile instead.

2. Put dependencies in .depend and include it in Makefile.ssl.

The second requires a make that does includes of course, but is more
elegant IMO - so, is there any good reason to prefer method one?

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
     - Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to