ben> I'm being driven slowly mad by the number of files that have to be in
ben> the CVS tree but also get modified by code. Most of them I can deal
ben> with, but one I need some feedback on.
ben> In general, Makefile.ssl is to Makefile (why???),
I'm guessing at EAY's intensions here, but I've noticed that there are
a couple of different Makefile.* in some directories, like crypto/des/.
My guess is that EAY wanted to provide for variants if needed, with
Makefile becoming a link to the Makefile.xxx that would suit the
current OS best.
ben> and dependencies tacked on to the end of Makefile.ssl.
What is really so bad with that? I know, if you do a lot of changes
everywhere, especially adding new files or changing what files are
#included, you end up doing a lot of dependency rechecking, but other
than that, not really...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vice Chairman and \ S-161 43 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur @ Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-20 09 64
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
