> > Bottom line. "#define BF_LONG unsigned int" still makes perfect sense on
> > all (well, at least on mentioned:-) platforms.
>
> Your patch is in the CVS. Please review the current CVS version or
> snapshot.
As someone pointed out there're machines with sizeof(int)==8 out there.
So I'd like to reserve some extra time for elaborating on the patch by
redefining BF_[M0-3] macros. If you allow I can also come up with some
alternative for #ifdef spaghetti in the beginning of
crypto/bf/bf_locl.org. SHA might need extra consideration too then...
>
> > On the other hand! Does the library actually *compile* under
> > MS-DOS/WIN16? Does *anybody* actually use it?
>
> I think Steve still builds Win16 versions.
Oh! Steve! Sure! I mean like I would know which one:-) Or is there only
one Steve? In either case, I'd like to say "Really? Wow!"
Cheers. Andy.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
