Ulf M�ller wrote:
>
> People get confused by the make links output. So I think Configure
> should print out something reassuring after make links is done.
>
> I also wonder if it wouldn't be enough to create the links only if
> the include directory is empty.
>
> I would also prefer to have a "links" dependency in the Makefile
> rather than running it from Configure. Does that break it for VC++?
You can't do that: it means the other dependencies aren't valid when the
Makefile is parsed. Unless I'm misunderstanding what you mean.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
