> > ... wondered what
> > happens if you attempt to compile it with -DSHA_XARRAY (as that's
> > actually what is *essentially* different between 0.9.4 and 0.9.5).
>
> Ok, the compilation at +O3 has now jumped over the sha_dgst.c hurdle
> and is very busy with rmd_dgst.c... Checked into rmd_dgst.c and bingo,
> it is the same construct as in SHA_ARRAY at rmd_dgst.c:295, including
> your respective comment... As of now the "ccom" has spend 12 minutes
> on this file, I will leave it running for some more time. Maybe it will
> terminate, but I guess it won't.
OK, the picture is clear. It makes sense to define common macro, say
MD32_XARRAY, on platform basis. Can you help with predefined macros on
HP-UX C?
Andy.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
